Its been over 8 days and I have only been able to download 6gigs! I have already emailed support last week and was informed by support that my acct would WAS reset so I could download again. It wasnt. So I have emailed 2 more times to support and no response. Why am I still waiting? You guys had no problem charging me ON TIME. So whats the problem???
FileJoker Sponsorship
- Thread starter chompy
- Start date
-
Akiba-Online is sponsored by FileJoker.
FileJoker is a required filehost for all new posts and content replies in the Direct Downloads subforums.
Failure to include FileJoker links for Direct Download posts will result in deletion of your posts or worse.
For more information see this thread.
Its been over 8 days and I have only been able to download 6gigs! I have already emailed support last week and was informed by support that my acct would WAS reset so I could download again. It wasnt. So I have emailed 2 more times to support and no response. Why am I still waiting? You guys had no problem charging me ON TIME. So whats the problem???
At this moment you ARE able to download. Also, we sent you very important information, please check your PM!
Hello MaxFJ,
Is your traffic limit correct?
I have a premium account, user 8181998025, and could only download 43 GB of the 50 GB available.
Before to download I checked my traffic available and it was 50 GB (50000 MB) so I never overreached the limit allowance.
Now, my account page shows that I only have 85 MB available.
Already sent you a message to your support email.
Please check it, thank you.
Is your traffic limit correct?
I have a premium account, user 8181998025, and could only download 43 GB of the 50 GB available.
Before to download I checked my traffic available and it was 50 GB (50000 MB) so I never overreached the limit allowance.
Now, my account page shows that I only have 85 MB available.
Already sent you a message to your support email.
Please check it, thank you.
Yes, it's correct. If you have any questions, you can contact support directly and we will be happy to help you!
Can you answer whether or not this scenario is accurate.
Say I find 5 files, each at 10GB each (say, 4K movies someone was nice enough to share). I click to start the download for each file but then decide, no, I can get these later at 1080p, I don’t need them in 4K. At that point right there, after I’ve started and stopped each one, maybe downloading only 10MB of each file for a total of 50MB TOTAL ACTUAL DOWNLOAD…to FileJoker, that constitutes that I have used 50GB of bandwidth simply because I even initiated the downloads, 5@10GB each.
Is that how FileJoker counts the download limits?
Say I find 5 files, each at 10GB each (say, 4K movies someone was nice enough to share). I click to start the download for each file but then decide, no, I can get these later at 1080p, I don’t need them in 4K. At that point right there, after I’ve started and stopped each one, maybe downloading only 10MB of each file for a total of 50MB TOTAL ACTUAL DOWNLOAD…to FileJoker, that constitutes that I have used 50GB of bandwidth simply because I even initiated the downloads, 5@10GB each.
Is that how FileJoker counts the download limits?
With all due respect there is nothing reasonable about the appetite for the content being provided here on FileJoker. And it is a problem for most reading through this thread. Technical Features are different than Technical Difficulties. This seems more like a throttle than a feature. Hosts shouldn't be in the business of imposing moderation and/or responsibility on its clients to choose anything carefully.
Also, a Feature is traditionally a selling point, something that should be front and center and advertised proudly as opposed to something users are disappointed about when they find out through experience after paying for a service.
Just a thought.
Also, a Feature is traditionally a selling point, something that should be front and center and advertised proudly as opposed to something users are disappointed about when they find out through experience after paying for a service.
Just a thought.
@Casshern2 Thanks for the feedback and your opinion. We will think about that and try to do our best to improve our service and users experience.
What is going on with filejoker? I am trying to register for a 30 day subscription, but it keeps declining my credit card, I have tried several, and they're all declined. I never had this problem before. Any idea what's wrong?
We have a few payment gateways for credit cards, please try the other one. Also, we have a few more alternative payment options, you can use them too.
This is some deceitful shit, why is traffic limit stuff not displayed when your signing up? I'm about to initiate a chargeback...
Information about limit is placed on our ToS page and everyone can find it at any moment. Almost all of users are OK with this limit. Besides, if you reach your limit we can help you, just contact our support!
Over The Top
but even if you only just read this thread it is written enough times, what you get, but Max has already answered, and it is true just contact support and help will be given
Will be there an ability to disable banner at the top for active premium users? They are already paying for the service, so there is no need to advertise it to them. An additional benefit would be having a smaller header
It's a question to forum's admin, but seems it would be technically very hard to determine premium users and term of their premium.
this isn't as easy as it sounds.Will be there an ability to disable banner at the top for active premium users? They are already paying for the service, so there is no need to advertise it to them. An additional benefit would be having a smaller header
To be able to do this, we have to somehow sync the users buying/having a prem. account from filejoker and our user-database.
This would either result in a lot of manual work or a bridge, which would connect our two systems, which probably we don't want to do.
the next problem is, what if the users don't have the same username ... not that easy ^^'
If MaxFJ has some api, which i can query with a username, this could probably be implemented - if i had more time at the moment ^^'
Last edited:
That's right, possible different usernames, emails and other info makes this very hard technically. We don't have API for that at this moment. But maybe some day we will back to this.
