FileJoker Sponsorship

regarding the filejoker notice at post #1 and in the header above. it states: "UPDATED: 6/5/2015". does this mean the rule is effective June 5, 2015? the disconnect between the June 5, 2015 and now is confusing [especially to us USAers].
 
Last edited:
It's may 6th, not june 5th since the notice said starting from now(If I'm remembering right) yesterday(or two days ago, I think there were two in a row). Also, that's only to say that the post was updated with new changes, not the date of the promotion.
That's why I hate date written that way since there's no worldwide standard, it changes depending on where you live.
 
  • Like
Reactions: meiX2 and CoolKevin
That's why I hate date written that way since there's no worldwide standard, it changes depending on where you live.

yes I agree, I prefer using 2015-05-06 because there is less mistakes

but the easiest way is as from the time it was posted in your area, and it was also the 7th in some places

I have edited it as well
 
Hello, I've had a post deleted from this thread: http://www.akiba-online.com/threads/dandy-013.1528082/

I understand I didn't put a FileJoker link in the reply, only Datafile, but the announcement says it's mandatory in the Direct Downloads forum section. So I'm wondering wether the post is meant to confuse? :D

no, you was just trying to be sneaky, what you do is add the links in the original thread, that is in the request section
 
no, you was just trying to be sneaky, what you do is add the links in the original thread, that is in the request section
Alright. Call me sneaky but I didn't know. The JAV Idol Request doesn't have any guidelines on the matter. My apologies.
 
For the record, I upload torrent at least monthly from a different account from my work computer as it's high speed. But, I will no longer upload torrents due to this rule. I am not here for business purposes. I won't be manipulated into paying for other people to do things. I won't pay for advertising. I won't be a part of it. Free or not at all. That's simply how it is. People take on the responsibility of providing websites like this. Why should I be part of the financial side when nobody pays me any of that cash. Sponsorship. Freedom of the Internet is gone, gone, gone.
 
And how exactly would you pay for the servers without any revenue? You can't run a website that big out of the goodness of your heart unless you're a millionaire.
No money = no website
 
For the record, I upload torrent at least monthly from a different account from my work computer as it's high speed. But, I will no longer upload torrents due to this rule. I am not here for business purposes. I won't be manipulated into paying for other people to do things. I won't pay for advertising. I won't be a part of it. Free or not at all. That's simply how it is. People take on the responsibility of providing websites like this. Why should I be part of the financial side when nobody pays me any of that cash. Sponsorship. Freedom of the Internet is gone, gone, gone.
Did I miss something? :confused: What does seeding of a torrent (man, you're brave - doing that at work) has to do with that rule that file host links always have to include also a FileJoker link. Or I'm wrong?

Hello, I've had a post deleted from this thread: http://www.akiba-online.com/threads/dandy-013.1528082/

I understand I didn't put a FileJoker link in the reply, only Datafile, but the announcement says it's mandatory in the Direct Downloads forum section. So I'm wondering wether the post is meant to confuse? :D
Alright. Call me sneaky but I didn't know. The JAV Idol Request doesn't have any guidelines on the matter. My apologies.
Also it isn't directly related to the rules: In such a case I recommend to add the links to the "JAV Downloads" section and put a link into the request thread. This way the request is answered, but you still find the links the normal way in the download section. I remember that Casshern2 is often doing it like this. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: CoolKevin
For the record, I upload torrent at least monthly from a different account from my work computer as it's high speed. But, I will no longer upload torrents due to this rule. I am not here for business purposes. I won't be manipulated into paying for other people to do things. I won't pay for advertising. I won't be a part of it. Free or not at all. That's simply how it is. People take on the responsibility of providing websites like this. Why should I be part of the financial side when nobody pays me any of that cash. Sponsorship. Freedom of the Internet is gone, gone, gone.


it seems you got slightly confused, or I totally missed the point as well

we are not asking for filejoker links in torrents, this is for the direct downloads
 
I have tried about 8 different resellers twice now plus direct buy 10 times.
I still can't renew or re-buy filejoker premium FOREVER now and I am losing my freakin mind !!!!!

HEEEEEELLLLLPPP!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: eshwaa
If your comfortable doing this you may have to call your bank and have them temporarily white-list "filejoker". After trying too many times my bank called and I had to have filejoker white-listed. After they unblocked it the tranaction finally worked. I'm glad I opted for one of the longer memberships because it looks like they no longer take Mastercard directly.

I'm hoping there are some members here who can share a specific gift card/re-loadable credit card that works with filejoker. @zoolanimal Did you ever find a rechargeable card that works here in the US?
 
[QUOTE = "coolkevin, post: 2997140, thành viên: 17.968"] Tôi đề nghị bạn thoát khỏi tất cả những thông tin và bắt đầu một lần nữa, [/ QUOTE]
Tôi đã thoát tất cả các thông tin, nhưng vẫn không thể đăng nhập FileZilla !!!!
giúp tôi !!!:(
 
The forum is now clever enough to check whether posts contain a filejoker link automatically. If you try to post without one, it will stop you, and gently remind you to include filejoker links.
 
If we use a service to protect our link from being deleted almost instantly, is it clever enough to let us post it anyway even if the link for filejoker aren't directly in the post?

For example, I use safelink.strike-up to protect my links with a password so bots can't get directly to the links and report them. I always have filejoker links available, but the address in the post is from safelink.strike-up and once you click on it and enter the password, it will display the filejoker links on their website.
It's a measure I've found necessary to use to keep my links alive for more than a few days.

Edit: Just saw yipman and c00lzero posts in the forum bug thread so I guess it isn't clever enough.

A solution that would probably make it safe to use the links directly in the posts would be to force people to hide them behind a specific tag and making the links visible only to registered members. Not sure if it's as effective against bots, but I've seen a few forum use that method.
 
Last edited:
...
A solution that would probably make it safe to use the links directly in the posts would be to force people to hide them behind a specific tag and making the links visible only to registered members. Not sure if it's as effective against bots, but I've seen a few forum use that method.

If I am not mistaken this forum is only available to registered members and filejoker links there die within very few hours.
At least in this forum bots shouldn't be able to harvest anything.
 
Ah yes, I forgot that was a member only section already. Bad idea then.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CoolKevin
Ah yes, I forgot that was a member only section already. Bad idea then.



No, you were right I think. Links get reposted and bots have memberships (they register and everything). I mean if spammers can register why not search bots? Of course those links often get reported for other reasons by other non-friendly board lurkers. The DDL areas in that section should probably be exempt from the restriction of not posting direct links to FileJoker but chances are the staff won't deem that practical and the posters will just have to make adjustments. The auto-detect is just too convienent and saves the staff a lot of hassle. A poster can still use a multi-host or safelink system and post only the direct FileJoker links from it without posting the other links. More work for the poster, less work for the staff here, but it is fair across the board.