, I wouldn't be so comfortable with calling people names just because they like something that doesn't align with your preferences.
Of course, in a way, all of us who watch porn are perverts. And I also assume that we all see it as a fantasy. When I use those terms, I assume it's a fantasy: the fantasy of being a fetishist, an abuser, etc. It's not a real-world term.
What I'm trying to say is that VR is now only made for those kinds of fantastical perversions. On the other hand, for perverts like me who are looking for realistic and intimate sex with nudes, there's almost nothing being made anymore. Apart from Moodyz, S1, Idea Pocket, and a few titles from other studios, there's nothing left. Not even 5%.
When I call it “trash,” it's not because of the subject matter, but because of the lack of immersion. For me, VR is immersion, feeling like you're inside the movie, feeling the girl. And in most of the titles announced in January, they're VRs for watching, the girl is always a meter away during sex. For me, personally, that's not VR. It's old 2D porn, in 3D. Trash.
If fetish titles were immersive (some are), I wouldn't call them trash, just VRs that I don't like. I rarely criticize a title that is immersive.