For those of you outside the US, child beauty pageants here are amongst the most shameful things going on. There is actually a term, prostitots, to describe the way these kids are presented. This user has a good point, the parents of these kids in child pageants are almost like pimps, it's disgusting.
No more children, please!
- Thread starter yabaijin
- Start date
-
Throughout the month of April 2024, participate in the FileJoker Thread Contest OPEN TO EVERYONE!
From 1st to 30th of April 2024, members can earn cash rewards by posting Filejoker-Exclusive threads in the Direct-Downloads subforums.
There are $1000 in prizes, and the top prize is $450!
For the full rules and how to enter, check out the thread -
Akiba-Online is sponsored by FileJoker.
FileJoker is a required filehost for all new posts and content replies in the Direct Downloads subforums.
Failure to include FileJoker links for Direct Download posts will result in deletion of your posts or worse.
For more information see this thread.
- Status
For those of you outside the US, child beauty pageants here are amongst the most shameful things going on. There is actually a term, prostitots, to describe the way these kids are presented. This user has a good point, the parents of these kids in child pageants are almost like pimps, it's disgusting.
This. Trolls being the CNN mass brainwashed clones who run home to download porn and be vigilantes/ethics police online at the same time.
I vote everyone from the JI forum ignore and quit posting in this thread. That simple.
You're right seiya1, we shouldn't give these preliterate keyboard bullies, their nitrous oxide of 'debate'. Most JI fans would stop a bullet for their idols; I wonder how many sheep shaggers (no offence), would do that for their furry fux? East is East and West is West and never the twain shall meet. Iggywiggy is the way. - Exits stage left.
Isn't that exactly what the bans on drawings are? Thought crimes.
If you look at a lot of the recent laws, they're mostly designed to throw people in jail who MIGHT commit a future crime against a real child. Thought crimes.
I just saw this thread.. I havent backtrack that much yet.. but...
For me there is nothing wrong...
If you think there is something wrong on 13yr olds wearing g-strings...
Then you are a Sick Person.
If you really hate them. .start with Commercials showing underage kids wearing only underwears.. and AVON there magazines are sick!
andalaugh:
and like arashi said
forgot to add..
If you do that.. Japanese industry will fallandalaugh:
For me there is nothing wrong...
If you think there is something wrong on 13yr olds wearing g-strings...
Then you are a Sick Person.
If you really hate them. .start with Commercials showing underage kids wearing only underwears.. and AVON there magazines are sick!
andalaugh:and like arashi said
forgot to add..
If you do that.. Japanese industry will fall
andalaugh:
There are no porn stars that look like children.
There are some porn actresses that look young, but they do not look like children. And there are some porn actresses that attempt to dress in clothing a child would wear and presumably act like a child in order to attract an audience of men who prefer young girls, however men who prefer young girls tend to prefer young girls and not porn actresses trying to look like young girls.
Really if you can't tell the difference between porn stars and young girls then perhaps you have a problem.
There are some porn actresses that look young, but they do not look like children. And there are some porn actresses that attempt to dress in clothing a child would wear and presumably act like a child in order to attract an audience of men who prefer young girls, however men who prefer young girls tend to prefer young girls and not porn actresses trying to look like young girls.
Really if you can't tell the difference between porn stars and young girls then perhaps you have a problem.
This whole topic should be deleted, IMO. Only clothed/in swimsuit "children" are posted on here. Children in swimsuits and fully clothed models are also featured in your JCPenny catalog.
Talking about "Child(ren)" and "porn" in the same topic(s), especially on here is probably bad news. There is nothing illegal on this site ... and if you somehow DID find something (very very doubtful) feel free to NOT make a post about it; and instead contact an admin or your local Priest ... oh wait, that last one is probably a bad idea ... considering he'd probably ask you for sites that hosted MALE child models ; )
Talking about "Child(ren)" and "porn" in the same topic(s), especially on here is probably bad news. There is nothing illegal on this site ... and if you somehow DID find something (very very doubtful) feel free to NOT make a post about it; and instead contact an admin or your local Priest ... oh wait, that last one is probably a bad idea ... considering he'd probably ask you for sites that hosted MALE child models ; )
Oh come off your cock-in-hand attitude. Most people here are arguing for/against kids that are not teenagers, but those that are younger. That plus what might make me a "sick person" if I don't agree with a child wearing sexually enticing underwear?
Sadly it will never die due to the number of total morons who think ANY pic of ANYONE whos under 30 is child porn uzzled:. They also think that fancying woman in thier mid 20's makes you a pedo uzzled: How on earth can you reason with people this dense is byond me.
uzzled:. They also think that fancying woman in thier mid 20's makes you a pedo uzzled: How on earth can you reason with people this dense is byond me.- Status