Declining quality of the rips

  • Throughout the month of April 2024, participate in the FileJoker Thread Contest OPEN TO EVERYONE!

    From 1st to 30th of April 2024, members can earn cash rewards by posting Filejoker-Exclusive threads in the Direct-Downloads subforums.

    There are $1000 in prizes, and the top prize is $450!

    For the full rules and how to enter, check out the thread
  • Akiba-Online is sponsored by FileJoker.

    FileJoker is a required filehost for all new posts and content replies in the Direct Downloads subforums.

    Failure to include FileJoker links for Direct Download posts will result in deletion of your posts or worse.

    For more information see
    this thread.

Casshern2

Senior Member...I think
Mar 22, 2008
6,876
14,249
There are a few members that are still bringing new/fresh titles to the board, but, still the ever present watermarks persist. The bad ones, the ones that are at the top and bottom, not to mention the added ads at the front. UUS69 dot com FTW! o_O
 

h0rn3t

New Member
Sep 1, 2016
17
13
I Thz prefer over dioguitar yellow watermarks which are the worst.
Thz rips have frame rate problems and the watermarks stay throughout the entire movie like JaponX.
7sht.me and 44x.me has watermarks at the front of the movies and a much larger size.

But my question is, what's the difference between the 7sht.me and 44x.me? Are the ads both the same?
which of the ads is longer/worse? How to choose the better of 7sht.me and 44x.me?

both are better you just need use avidemux to manually remove the beginning ads without losing any quality. and the rest is good.
 

Trainman

Active Member
Feb 8, 2016
288
177
both are better you just need use avidemux to manually remove the beginning ads without losing any quality. and the rest is good.

Is that even possible? I'm not well versed in encoding but from what i know it takes a lot of work to transcode and splice together a 6gb movie
 

Casshern2

Senior Member...I think
Mar 22, 2008
6,876
14,249
Is that even possible? I'm not well versed in encoding but from what i know it takes a lot of work to transcode and splice together a 6gb movie
He just means using the tool to split the file not re-encode anything
 
  • Like
Reactions: Trainman

Casshern2

Senior Member...I think
Mar 22, 2008
6,876
14,249
Thanks, is there any quality loss from splitting the front end?
So long as the tool simply splits the file and doesn't encode anything, no.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Trainman

jbjr

New Member
Nov 9, 2014
14
2
ive noticed a few 1080p rips lately where the resolution goes from fhd to 256x144 throughout the file. dont know which group or individual is doing the encoding but im guessing its messing up because theyre recording a stream with fluctuating quality and they dont double check it afterwards or think its worth the time to fix.
 

Casshern2

Senior Member...I think
Mar 22, 2008
6,876
14,249
ive noticed a few 1080p rips lately where the resolution goes from fhd to 256x144 throughout the file. dont know which group or individual is doing the encoding but im guessing its messing up because theyre recording a stream with fluctuating quality and they dont double check it afterwards or think its worth the time to fix.
Ouch. Posted here or out in the wild?
 

jbjr

New Member
Nov 9, 2014
14
2
Ouch. Posted here or out in the wild?
out in the wild though im sure at least some have made there way here. abba-509 is an example but it hasnt been posted here. you can usually tell based on the file size if its split into 2 parts because one will be a fraction of the other file even though most times theyre split in half or pretty close. ynps-002 is another example. those two examples are compilations. it may not be something to worry about with non-compilations or more popular releases because multiple ppl are ripping those so you dont end up with just one messed up rip that everyone is passing around.