O o0mixer0o New Member Apr 5, 2008 36 0 0 Apr 17, 2008 #1 Well i was on I-AM-Bored.com when i found dis, i guess i wont be getting nut cancer any time soon:XD:
Well i was on I-AM-Bored.com when i found dis, i guess i wont be getting nut cancer any time soon:XD:
handyman Super Perv Former Staff Nov 16, 2006 4,455 141 63 Apr 17, 2008 #2 LOL @ "This is a plausible theory"
E Euchale New Member Apr 5, 2008 14 0 1 35 Apr 18, 2008 #3 Idk why, but i already heard that about 3 or 5 years ago. :moe:
S Seeboll Member Sep 17, 2007 862 6 18 Apr 18, 2008 #4 haha, sure, would be very good news if it's true. =D But why would a researcher choose 1000 "subjects" of one category and 1250 of the other? Seems very illogical from a research perspective.
haha, sure, would be very good news if it's true. =D But why would a researcher choose 1000 "subjects" of one category and 1250 of the other? Seems very illogical from a research perspective.
F Fantalo The Mercy Seat is Waiting Mar 7, 2008 26 1 1 Apr 25, 2008 #5 They should have checked into how many of them were going blind as well. A bloke can't win, if he does he goes blind if he doesn't he gets nut cancer.
They should have checked into how many of them were going blind as well. A bloke can't win, if he does he goes blind if he doesn't he gets nut cancer.