Uncensored or Original Mosaic AV?

Trainman

Active Member
Feb 8, 2016
334
204
43
Hi guys, having a bit of dilemma as the title implies.

Ever since AV has Uncensored Leaks, do you prefer original mosaic or uncensored releases?
In the past, the choice was obvious as decensoring technology was poor. But now with A.I technology the mosaic seems to be removed almost completely.
The only drawback is that these Uncensored releases have watermarks from a group 'SUPJAV'. The original mosaic does not, and they retain higher image quality.
For fellow AV collectors which is the better choice especially given inflated storage prices due to A.I datacenters. I only want to have one copy to save space.
 
Hi guys, having a bit of dilemma as the title implies.

Ever since AV has Uncensored Leaks, do you prefer original mosaic or uncensored releases?
In the past, the choice was obvious as decensoring technology was poor. But now with A.I technology the mosaic seems to be removed almost completely.
The only drawback is that these Uncensored releases have watermarks from a group 'SUPJAV'. The original mosaic does not, and they retain higher image quality.
For fellow AV collectors which is the better choice especially given inflated storage prices due to A.I datacenters. I only want to have one copy to save space.
If you dont like watermark, you can do de-mosaic with your hardware on raw mosaic files
tho that requires decent hardware for reasonable processing time + your collection is small size or it will take much longer time.
pretty sure supjav and others also use tools like lada/jasna with some tweaks. More details:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Trainman
If you dont like watermark, you can do de-mosaic with your hardware on raw mosaic files
tho that requires decent hardware for reasonable processing time + your collection is small size or it will take much longer time.
pretty sure supjav and others also use tools like lada/jasna with some tweaks. More details:
Thanks for the info. So that's how they decensor it. I don't think I have the time to go through my entire collection as it's rather large. But I do notice even after decensoring, actor's pecker has weird artificats especially during movement. So I may stick to original mosaiced for now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: aronora
If we're talking actual uncensored leaks, I prefer those, but if you mean decensored, I prefer the mosaic version, for now. Maybe if they perfect it enough where you can no longer tell the difference I will change myind.
I did a few attempts with LADA myself, but that looked even worse that the better decensored stuff out there. Not sure whether my settings were wrong or they use better software than LADA.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Trainman
If we're talking actual uncensored leaks, I prefer those, but if you mean decensored, I prefer the mosaic version, for now. Maybe if they perfect it enough where you can no longer tell the difference I will change myind.
I did a few attempts with LADA myself, but that looked even worse that the better decensored stuff out there. Not sure whether my settings were wrong or they use better software than LADA.
I've enjoyed using LADA to decensor and like the results, mostly. Sometimes there is a slight glitch. I think I've done more than 200 movies at this point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Trainman
If we're talking actual uncensored leaks, I prefer those, but if you mean decensored, I prefer the mosaic version, for now. Maybe if they perfect it enough where you can no longer tell the difference I will change myind.
I did a few attempts with LADA myself, but that looked even worse that the better decensored stuff out there. Not sure whether my settings were wrong or they use better software than LADA.
Didn't realize uncensored leaks and decensored were different. I guess the leaks are from original source before studios added the mosaics. and the decensored works from the mosaics resulting in worse output. The movies released are often just titled 'uncensored'.
 
I would like to say it's just a matter of time before uncensored and decensored are completely the same, but the truth is that technology is already there. Big tech LLMs are perfectly capable of restoring pixelated content at this point but alas we live in a bigoted and hypocrite society that stigmatizes sex and pornography which makes nsfw content generation with those models pretty much impossible. For now we can only rely on local models like LADA or javplayer that don't are even remotely as powerful as those big tech models could be.
 
100% original unless it's a real leak. Current Uncensored movies are just software AI slobs. Looks very bad.
When was the last time you and some others had checked AI mosaic removed I wonder?
The early MR back in 2023/2024 left some bad impression to many (me included) of a messy blurry crap. However, lada and jasna have been improving their training + detect + restore models a lot this year. Recent MR from supjav, which is using customised lada iirc, is still imperfect but kinda decent imo.
 
When was the last time you and some others had checked AI mosaic removed I wonder?
The early MR back in 2023/2024 left some bad impression to many (me included) of a messy blurry crap. However, lada and jasna have been improving their training + detect + restore models a lot this year. Recent MR from supjav, which is using customised lada iirc, is still imperfect but kinda decent imo.
whatever new movies in supjav. Genitals are a blurry rubber slob. Sometimes it's pixelated sometimes it's not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: playgo
Hi guys, having a bit of dilemma as the title implies.

Ever since AV has Uncensored Leaks, do you prefer original mosaic or uncensored releases?
In the past, the choice was obvious as decensoring technology was poor. But now with A.I technology the mosaic seems to be removed almost completely.
The only drawback is that these Uncensored releases have watermarks from a group 'SUPJAV'. The original mosaic does not, and they retain higher image quality.
For fellow AV collectors which is the better choice especially given inflated storage prices due to A.I datacenters. I only want to have one copy to save space.
Japanese native porn customers are used to watch pixelated porn -
because they know exactly what men and women have between legs...
Now Western JAV watchers are never satisfied with original Japanese censored JAV production -
and they try to change/edit original movies (with pixelation of genitals) by any artificial (AI) means,
and result - they are watching movies with disgustingly distorted (artificially edited) genitals.

Whereever the real (not edited by AI) bodyparts are in contact with edited/decensored male or female genitals,
all those bodyparts (fingers, tongue, lips) sadly get distorted too.
The fingers have a severely distorted appearance by pussy fingering.
The penises are changing erratically in size and shape, the same glans penis varies from small to big.
The labia are distorted beyond recognition - nothing seems real.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: zombierambo
Japanese native porn customers are used to watch pixelated porn -
because they know exactly what men and women have between legs...
Now Western JAV watchers are never satisfied with original Japanese censored JAV production -
and they try to change/edit original movies (with pixelation of genitals) by any artificial (AI) means,
and result - they are watching movies with disgustingly distorted (artificially edited) genitals.

Whereever the real (not edited by AI) bodyparts are in contact with edited/decensored male or female genitals,
all those bodyparts (fingers, tongue, lips) sadly get distorted too.
The fingers have a severely distorted appearance by pussy fingering.
The penises are changing erratically in size and shape, the same glans penis varies from small to big.
The labia are distorted beyond recognition - nothing seems real.
Aside from it looking fake and ridiculous as you say, I'm just used to mosaic at this point and don't really care. Even if an uncensored version is available, I'm not that bothered to even seek it out. As a bonus, I don't have to see japanese dicks.