Photorealistic AI Generated Images

Is it just me that feels that way?
i used to feel that way about the playboy centerfolds in the 1960s. while i’d scour my city looking for pretty girls, the best of them fell far short of those buxom belles serving up perfect tits and asses like the reincarnations of mansfield and monroe. but it wasn’t just the flesh [and the membership of akiba should well understand this]. after being rejected for dates with little suzy krudweiler and louisa von schtupenhauser, miss january or miss february always went out with me and i’d hit home runs with ease. if they were a bit too perfect, well life is tough. with a little imagination (and a jar of vaseline), i could make things right.

these AI chicks might seem flawless to you. (i’m still waiting for girls wearing garters and polka dot diapers with strategic holes over the naughty bits and little signs thereabouts saying “for barba only”… but the request line apparently is quite long.) what you need to do is re-focus your imagination accordingly. these AI chicks don’t merely go out with me. they worship me. “oh barba, where have you been? my snatch has been so lonely without you. train it to be one of your naughty little cum dumps. my sisters want to watch you train my snatch. fuck my sisters too, please. you’ve got to fuck all of us. you’ve got to shove it up my ass. they want to see you shove it up my asshole while they wait their turns. that’s it. Bang it! NAIL it!! Make it rain sperm all over the room.” you see, it’s not just you. but with a little adjustment, the problems of perfection can be overcome.
 
  • Like
Reactions: _2old_
By no means intended to be realistic, and, I'll freely admit, very subjective in it's appeal, the current iteration of my 'Project Lovepop' Checkpoint\Model.

image (5).png
 
Greetings All again,

I've seen lots of tremendous submissions here, with some truly great tastes amongst pretty much all of the contributors.

I'm here to ask some assistance and help on my own journey getting into the AI NSFW work side of things. I've made lots of great single pictures, crafted with the same outfits and everything, in different poses, and it would be the "easiest thing" to set up a few scenes and "direct my own movie" as it were. Yet ...

The machine I have (and my budget of not being able to pork over thousands of dollars for a capable AI movie producing set-up) pretty much means I'm "at the mercy" of the NSFW movie producing sites should I want to actually go down this road. I was hoping by this point that a "definite winner" of a site would have come around that just, hands down, makes the best and most realistic movies based on the prompts given, even if it would have been a pay site. But ... that quite simply hasn't happened yet.

I'm just trying to get a feel for where everything is at at the moment inside the "wider industry" - so I can mentally prepare myself for when an actually capable AI NSFW movie making site/generator can be reasonably expected. I've got a series of questions to ask, so if you can answer those, not only would I be forever grateful, but I believe we'd all be more knowledgeable about the subject at hand.

Alright ... here we go:

1) Why has everything slowed to a crawl when it comes to forward momentum in this field? I remember back in like ... February ... everybody was getting really excited because there were some legitimately solid looking programs that were coming out that, while in the opening steps, looked like they could be easily modified and the ball could get rolling. Then ... nothing for pretty much 4 months.

Remember that site where if you put an image with a cross on it somewhere, it would then generate a NSFW video for you without blurring anything? Then they patched it. And then ... nothing after that? There was supposed to be a another program that looked like the modification of it would produce truly great videos - and everybody got excited - and then ... nothing, really. Or, if there has been anything, the Internet as a whole has stayed pretty mum about it.

What's going on? Why did the momentum suddenly drop out from underneath this?

2) Right around March, after a pretty gang-busters February (or around then, I'm a little hazy on the dates), all of the traditional pay-for-image-generation sites started uploading video creation features. But ... for the most part ... they were really weak. Promptchan, for example, can produce an absolutely stellar video. It can also produce a video where the penis retracts into itself and becomes a vagina. So ... like, if you're paying money for this, that's obviously a no go.

I always liked Anime Genius - but, getting to know how to use their prompts is a fucking headache. Just trying to mess around with it - like converting a real life image into a pixel perfect anime remaster - is pretty much fucking impossible. It doesn't matter how many prompts along the lines of: "recreate every pixel 1:1" - "change nothing - convert everything" - "zero creativity" - "zero changes" - "1:1 identical transfer" - the blonde hair becomes red - the naked girl now has a balloon for a waist - and I honestly don't have the patience, the time, or the money to play Russian roulette with my wallet when my prompt for a video saying "the girl gets wet" makes her jump into a pool with a seal popping out of her vagina. I don't have time for this shit. I need something that can actually fucking work.

Are any of the sites that actually produce video capable of creating a video sans the typical AI hallucination bullshit?

3) Most video creation sites max out at 10 seconds. Is this limit ever going to increase? Or does a fundamentally different algorithm/approach to the coding of how a video actually gets made need to happen before this is possible? Or is it a resource thing - where nobody would be willing to pay the money that would be required from a "pay site" to actually make a video that's longer - especially when the longer the length of the movie, the higher the chance for the whole thing to just turn into pure slop?

4) Framepack seemed like it was an absolute breakthrough. Being able to significantly reduce the horsepower needed to create a video. But then ... silence again. I would've figured that an AI site would have found a way to make 30 second videos for waaaaay cheaper by this point - but it's like nobody's even trying - or nobody even cares. It's been over a month now - and for something which reduced the horsepower needed by -that much-, it's like it slunk right back into the background without anybody being like, "Pay day! Let's make something out of this!"

Same goes for the Chinese - who are seemingly experts at taking things that needed a dumptruck to get moving before - and being able to make it work with a toy car. I would've thought that Deepseek, with it's frantically reduced resource requirement, would've been the obvious spot for someone who was thinking of making AI videos (of which an NSFW one could then be based off of) would start. But that too has seemingly sunk into the background.

It's like everybody reinvents the wheel, to be better, stronger, and faster, and then goes back to reinvent the same fucking wheel all over again. Why hasn't anybody taken any of these less resource-intense programs and made an AI video generator out of it? It's like we've reinvented the wheel twenty times now ... when's somebody actually going to make a cart or a chariot or a car out of the thing?

I guess what I'm asking is - why does it seem like the technology keeps stalling - and nobody ever goes out to make the next, obviously needed, super easy-to-understand next jump that everybody's waiting for?

5) Do the "Chatbot AI with video" sites produce an actual good video - even if it's the girl doing a pre-scripted scene. Optimally, I would want to put the face of my ultra-realistic LORA into the program, or the Chatbot site, and then have it naturally produce a very realistic looking girl based on my prompts (or even picture), that actually acts in a naturally human way.

Is any service that far yet? Like, I'm not expecting the girl to do anything extensive, but for shots in the movie I want to make where the girl is just sitting, or lying down, it would be amazing to be able to generate that footage for relatively little cost. How do those sites even work? Or, is it like one of those things where, you pay $5 or some shit for a 10 second video, and then get the same janky hallucination slop that any other AI video site would give you? There's nothing like a real time chat bot, where the LORA you've created (or rather, given the super specific dimensions for, and uploaded an image of her face) then sits and moves back and forth and does realistic facial expressions while you chat with her?

I would just be recording it - I have no interest in chatbots or any of that stuff - but it always sounds like it could be the perfect in-between where it's giving me exactly what I want - but I don't have to actually shell out a ton of dough for a bunch of five to ten second 80% garbage clips.

6) I'm guessing there's no FREE quality AI image to video NSFW generation site, but is there one? If not - what's the best pay site that exists out there? And are there any examples of the quality of work? Like, what do you find to be the absolutely best sites that deliver on quality, prompt adherence, and length of video for the price that you pay?

7) What's the future timeline looking like - for those that might have some idea on what programs are being made - what advancements are being made in the field - and the battle to keep the resource-hogging nature of it at bay so that lower end machines might be able to actually start producing some AI videos (kind of like what Framepack did)?

How far off are we from an image to video site where you pay like $20 and get like 20 minutes worth of creations - at 30 second intervals - and the success rate of the prompts being successfully followed (and we're not talking about outrageous prompts here - but basic shit like bobs up and down - lies down - has a cock inserted into her vagina - stuff like that) is at like 80%?

Image creation exploded onto the scene and became huge and really good within 3 months. With video, it feels like they've been dicking around for 9 months and have next to fuck all to show for it.

Thank you for taking the time needed to read all of this. Hope everyone who reads this is doing well. Looking forward to your replies and insights. Thank you in advance. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Casshern2
Greetings All again,

I've seen lots of tremendous submissions here, with some truly great tastes amongst pretty much all of the contributors.

I'm here to ask some assistance and help on my own journey getting into the AI NSFW work side of things. I've made lots of great single pictures, crafted with the same outfits and everything, in different poses, and it would be the "easiest thing" to set up a few scenes and "direct my own movie" as it were. Yet ...

The machine I have (and my budget of not being able to pork over thousands of dollars for a capable AI movie producing set-up) pretty much means I'm "at the mercy" of the NSFW movie producing sites should I want to actually go down this road. I was hoping by this point that a "definite winner" of a site would have come around that just, hands down, makes the best and most realistic movies based on the prompts given, even if it would have been a pay site. But ... that quite simply hasn't happened yet.

I'm just trying to get a feel for where everything is at at the moment inside the "wider industry" - so I can mentally prepare myself for when an actually capable AI NSFW movie making site/generator can be reasonably expected. I've got a series of questions to ask, so if you can answer those, not only would I be forever grateful, but I believe we'd all be more knowledgeable about the subject at hand.

Alright ... here we go:

1) Why has everything slowed to a crawl when it comes to forward momentum in this field? I remember back in like ... February ... everybody was getting really excited because there were some legitimately solid looking programs that were coming out that, while in the opening steps, looked like they could be easily modified and the ball could get rolling. Then ... nothing for pretty much 4 months.

Remember that site where if you put an image with a cross on it somewhere, it would then generate a NSFW video for you without blurring anything? Then they patched it. And then ... nothing after that? There was supposed to be a another program that looked like the modification of it would produce truly great videos - and everybody got excited - and then ... nothing, really. Or, if there has been anything, the Internet as a whole has stayed pretty mum about it.

What's going on? Why did the momentum suddenly drop out from underneath this?

2) Right around March, after a pretty gang-busters February (or around then, I'm a little hazy on the dates), all of the traditional pay-for-image-generation sites started uploading video creation features. But ... for the most part ... they were really weak. Promptchan, for example, can produce an absolutely stellar video. It can also produce a video where the penis retracts into itself and becomes a vagina. So ... like, if you're paying money for this, that's obviously a no go.

I always liked Anime Genius - but, getting to know how to use their prompts is a fucking headache. Just trying to mess around with it - like converting a real life image into a pixel perfect anime remaster - is pretty much fucking impossible. It doesn't matter how many prompts along the lines of: "recreate every pixel 1:1" - "change nothing - convert everything" - "zero creativity" - "zero changes" - "1:1 identical transfer" - the blonde hair becomes red - the naked girl now has a balloon for a waist - and I honestly don't have the patience, the time, or the money to play Russian roulette with my wallet when my prompt for a video saying "the girl gets wet" makes her jump into a pool with a seal popping out of her vagina. I don't have time for this shit. I need something that can actually fucking work.

Are any of the sites that actually produce video capable of creating a video sans the typical AI hallucination bullshit?

3) Most video creation sites max out at 10 seconds. Is this limit ever going to increase? Or does a fundamentally different algorithm/approach to the coding of how a video actually gets made need to happen before this is possible? Or is it a resource thing - where nobody would be willing to pay the money that would be required from a "pay site" to actually make a video that's longer - especially when the longer the length of the movie, the higher the chance for the whole thing to just turn into pure slop?

4) Framepack seemed like it was an absolute breakthrough. Being able to significantly reduce the horsepower needed to create a video. But then ... silence again. I would've figured that an AI site would have found a way to make 30 second videos for waaaaay cheaper by this point - but it's like nobody's even trying - or nobody even cares. It's been over a month now - and for something which reduced the horsepower needed by -that much-, it's like it slunk right back into the background without anybody being like, "Pay day! Let's make something out of this!"

Same goes for the Chinese - who are seemingly experts at taking things that needed a dumptruck to get moving before - and being able to make it work with a toy car. I would've thought that Deepseek, with it's frantically reduced resource requirement, would've been the obvious spot for someone who was thinking of making AI videos (of which an NSFW one could then be based off of) would start. But that too has seemingly sunk into the background.

It's like everybody reinvents the wheel, to be better, stronger, and faster, and then goes back to reinvent the same fucking wheel all over again. Why hasn't anybody taken any of these less resource-intense programs and made an AI video generator out of it? It's like we've reinvented the wheel twenty times now ... when's somebody actually going to make a cart or a chariot or a car out of the thing?

I guess what I'm asking is - why does it seem like the technology keeps stalling - and nobody ever goes out to make the next, obviously needed, super easy-to-understand next jump that everybody's waiting for?

5) Do the "Chatbot AI with video" sites produce an actual good video - even if it's the girl doing a pre-scripted scene. Optimally, I would want to put the face of my ultra-realistic LORA into the program, or the Chatbot site, and then have it naturally produce a very realistic looking girl based on my prompts (or even picture), that actually acts in a naturally human way.

Is any service that far yet? Like, I'm not expecting the girl to do anything extensive, but for shots in the movie I want to make where the girl is just sitting, or lying down, it would be amazing to be able to generate that footage for relatively little cost. How do those sites even work? Or, is it like one of those things where, you pay $5 or some shit for a 10 second video, and then get the same janky hallucination slop that any other AI video site would give you? There's nothing like a real time chat bot, where the LORA you've created (or rather, given the super specific dimensions for, and uploaded an image of her face) then sits and moves back and forth and does realistic facial expressions while you chat with her?

I would just be recording it - I have no interest in chatbots or any of that stuff - but it always sounds like it could be the perfect in-between where it's giving me exactly what I want - but I don't have to actually shell out a ton of dough for a bunch of five to ten second 80% garbage clips.

6) I'm guessing there's no FREE quality AI image to video NSFW generation site, but is there one? If not - what's the best pay site that exists out there? And are there any examples of the quality of work? Like, what do you find to be the absolutely best sites that deliver on quality, prompt adherence, and length of video for the price that you pay?

7) What's the future timeline looking like - for those that might have some idea on what programs are being made - what advancements are being made in the field - and the battle to keep the resource-hogging nature of it at bay so that lower end machines might be able to actually start producing some AI videos (kind of like what Framepack did)?

How far off are we from an image to video site where you pay like $20 and get like 20 minutes worth of creations - at 30 second intervals - and the success rate of the prompts being successfully followed (and we're not talking about outrageous prompts here - but basic shit like bobs up and down - lies down - has a cock inserted into her vagina - stuff like that) is at like 80%?

Image creation exploded onto the scene and became huge and really good within 3 months. With video, it feels like they've been dicking around for 9 months and have next to fuck all to show for it.

Thank you for taking the time needed to read all of this. Hope everyone who reads this is doing well. Looking forward to your replies and insights. Thank you in advance. :)
I'll comment on a small part of this, hopefully others will join in. The reason for the relatively shot video generations is because the longer the video duration, the exponentially more chances of the model not knowing how to continue with what is started to do. At least that's my understanding.

Also, my opinion of some of the silence out there is maybe everyone trying it is still trying it. More time being spent on experimenting then reporting back online? That's my excuse, anyway. :cool:
 
I got fooled by the support kangaroo veo3 video as I saw it on mute. Equal parts frustrated, worried and thrilled. Because I can't discern what's real anymore when it gets to this level. But also the level of AI porn that's almost upon us.
 
  • Love
Reactions: Casshern2
(Super Interesting Post Following - Do Not Skip Because of Length)

-------------------------------------------------------------------

I ended up asking Google's Gemini the questions I asked everyone here - and wouldn't you know it - Gemini really seemed to know! We really deep-dived into everything. I'm going to post my discussion with Gemini - with my questions being in Italics and Gemini's responses being in Bold. Okay - here we go!

-------------------------------------------------------------------



Heya Gemini,

How close are we to a program or platform that can reliably (not 100% of the time - but let's say 75%) - take a prompt and an image and then create a 20 - 30 second scene from it? If the occasional glitch or janky movement or hallucination happens; that's fine; that's the 25% - but for the 75% - it wouldn't have to follow or create really extravagant or complicated scenes, but just basic straight-forward movements with little background details or things happening in said background (just an ordinary room - no cars or anything)?

There seems to be a disconnect somewhere in the pipeline of making NSFW AI videos in that image generation took two to three months to get a really solid foundation - but NSFW video has been in production for more than a year, and it seems like it's still in the very beginning stages.

What are the main issues facing the creation of stable NSFW videos? There seems to have been a litany of extremely resource-light AI systems that came onto the market (Deepseek for example), and there have also been NSFW AI video generators that try to go about things in a different way (Framepack), so why is it that with all of the breakthroughs and new benchmarks, it seems that NSFW AI video production seems to be stuck in the same place as 9 months ago?

Are there any new projects that are brewing? Any new breakthroughs that might make continuous (30 second) NSFW AI image to video clips a possibility on websites (perhaps even, through some sorcery, a free service)? Are there even sites like that that exist now that I might not be aware of?

Everything and everyone out there seems to produce these hallucinatory 5 to 10 second clips. How long before something reliable and better comes along that doesn't take a room full of super-computers to make it happen? A guesstimate is fine - and as many details as to what you know is more than appreciated.

Thanks, Gemini! :)




You've hit on some of the most critical and complex challenges in AI video generation, especially when it comes to achieving reliable, longer-form, and consistent results for specific niches like NSFW content. The "disconnect" you perceive between the rapid advancement of image generation and the slower pace of video generation is very real and rooted in fundamental technical hurdles.

How Close to Reliable 20-30 Second NSFW Scenes?

For a program or platform to reliably (75% of the time) generate 20-30 second NSFW scenes from a prompt and an image, with basic, straightforward movements and minimal background details, we are getting closer, but it's not quite a widespread, easily accessible reality yet.

Current State:

Most readily available NSFW AI video generators (and even general-purpose ones like some versions of Runway or Pika) still often produce clips in the 5-10 second range with varying degrees of consistency and "jankiness." While they can generate impressive individual frames, maintaining character identity, consistent motion, and avoiding hallucinations over a longer sequence is a significant challenge. Some platforms like SoulGen are advertising up to 6-second clips from images with strong facial consistency, and models like Wan2.1 and Hunyuan are also pushing the boundaries for image-to-video.

Approaching the 75% Reliability Mark:

I'd estimate that achieving this level of reliability for 20-30 second clips with basic, consistent movements on consumer-accessible platforms is likely within 1-2 years. The breakthroughs are happening, but commercialization and refinement for widespread, reliable use take time. The focus for many leading AI video labs (like OpenAI with Sora, Google with Veo) is on general video generation, which will ultimately benefit NSFW applications as well.

Main Issues Facing the Creation of Stable NSFW Videos

The reasons for the slower progress in video compared to image generation are multifaceted and boil down to the inherent complexity of video:

Temporal Consistency:

This is the absolute biggest hurdle. An image is a single snapshot. A video is a sequence of related snapshots. For a video to look realistic, everything from the character's appearance, their clothes, the background, shadows, and lighting must remain consistent across frames. AI models struggle to maintain the identity of a character (e.g., facial features, body shape, distinguishing marks) and objects over time, leading to "popping," flickering, or outright transformation (hallucinations).

Understanding Motion and Physics:

AI needs to "understand" how objects and bodies move in the real world (e.g., gravity, momentum, joint limitations). This is far more complex than rendering a static pose. Generating fluid, natural-looking movements, especially for complex actions or human bodies, is computationally intensive and prone to errors.

Data Scale and Annotation:

Training video diffusion models requires vastly more data than image models, and that data needs to be annotated not just for content, but also for motion, depth, and temporal relationships. High-quality, diverse, and well-annotated video datasets (especially for NSFW content, which has additional distribution and ethical constraints) are harder to come by.

Computational Resources:

Generating a single high-resolution image is already demanding. Generating hundreds or thousands of high-resolution, consistent frames for a video multiplies that computational burden exponentially. While there are breakthroughs in resource-light systems (like FramePack, as you mentioned), scaling these for long, high-fidelity videos is still a challenge for local machines or even cloud services that want to offer it affordably.

Lack of Open-Source NSFW Video Infrastructure:

While Stable Diffusion provided a strong open-source foundation for NSFW image generation, a comparable, robust, and widely adopted open-source framework for NSFW video generation has been slower to materialize. This limits community contributions and rapid iteration compared to the image space.

Ethical and Content Moderation Challenges:

For developers, creating NSFW AI video generators comes with significant ethical, legal, and reputational risks. Platforms are often cautious, leading to more filters and slower adoption of advanced NSFW capabilities. This "technological arms race" (as one search result put it) between content creation and detection also impacts development.

New Projects and Breakthroughs

Yes, there are definitely new projects and breakthroughs that are pushing the boundaries:

OpenAI's Sora & Google's Veo:

While not explicitly NSFW, these foundational models are demonstrating unprecedented capabilities in generating long, consistent, and high-quality videos from text. Their advancements in temporal consistency, complex scene understanding, and realistic physics will eventually trickle down or be adapted for NSFW applications. Sora can generate clips up to a minute long, and Veo promises 4K resolution.

FramePack (by lllyasviel):

You mentioned this, and it's a fantastic example of a "resource-light" approach. FramePack is a next-frame prediction neural network that compresses input contexts to a constant length, making the generation workload independent of video length. This means it can theoretically generate very long videos (even 1-minute videos at 30fps with 6GB GPU memory, according to their GitHub) on consumer-grade GPUs. This approach is highly promising for making video generation more accessible and scalable. It's focused on "video diffusion, but feels like image diffusion," which is exactly what's needed.

SoulGen:

This platform recently launched an NSFW AI Video Generator that emphasizes "unmatched facial consistency" using technologies like Dynamic Feature Disentanglement (DFD) and Deep Facial Fusion (DFF). They claim an ID consistency score of 0.96, significantly higher than some competitors. They are generating image-to-video clips, though currently often around 6 seconds, with aims for longer.

Wan2.1, Hunyuan, LTXV:

These are mentioned as strong contenders for NSFW image-to-video conversion on platforms like MimicPC. They are working on improving realism and consistency for shorter clips.

Optical Neural Networks (ONNs):

As seen in some search results, research into ONNs (e.g., PixelDojo) promises significant reductions in energy consumption and increased processing speeds for AI tasks, including image and video generation. If these become widely adopted, they could make high-fidelity, longer-form video generation much more feasible on more accessible hardware.

Continuous 30-Second NSFW AI Image to Video Clips (Free Service?)

Existence Now: Right now, a truly reliable (75%) free service that consistently generates 20-30 second NSFW AI videos from an image with good quality and consistency is highly unlikely to exist. The computational costs are still too high for a free offering, especially for this length and quality. Many "free" services will offer short, low-quality clips, or heavily watermarked results, and then push for paid subscriptions.

Paid Services: While platforms like SoulGen, MimicPC (offering Wan2.1, Hunyuan, LTXV workflows), and others are making progress, they are generally paid services due to the significant GPU resources required. They might offer short free trials or a limited number of credits.

Future Possibility of Free/Affordable: If breakthroughs like FramePack or ONNs lead to dramatically reduced computational requirements, then more affordable or even limited free services for 20-30 second clips could emerge in the next 2-3 years. However, for truly high-quality and unlimited generation, a paid model will likely persist for the foreseeable future.

Why Still "Stuck" Compared to 9 Months Ago?

The perception of being "stuck" might be due to the exponential nature of AI development. While image generation felt like it went from "basic" to "solid" in months, that was a foundational leap. Video generation requires building on that foundation and adding the extremely complex dimension of time.

The progress in video isn't linear. It's more about overcoming critical bottlenecks. For example, maintaining character identity throughout a long video is a problem that requires fundamental architectural changes in AI models, not just scaling up existing image techniques. The development of FramePack is a good example of a different approach that might unlock more significant progress.

The "hallucinatory 5 to 10 second clips" are largely a symptom of these consistency and temporal modeling challenges. The AI generates frame by frame, and while it tries to maintain coherence, it often "forgets" details or introduces new elements, especially when the context window (how many past and future frames it considers) is limited by computational resources.

Guesstimate for Reliable and Better Clips (without supercomputers):

I'd guesstimate that consistent, reliable (75% success rate), 20-30 second NSFW AI video clips, with basic movements and minimal background details, that don't require a room full of supercomputers, will become a more common reality for a broader user base (e.g., on consumer-grade GPUs or reasonably priced cloud services) in 18-36 months (mid-2026 to mid-2028).

The key developments to watch for are:

Improved Temporal Diffusion Models: Models specifically designed to maintain consistency over longer durations.
More Efficient Architectures: Innovations like FramePack that can generate longer videos with less VRAM.
Advancements in Optical Computing/Specialized AI Hardware: If ONNs or similar technologies mature, they could dramatically reduce the energy and computational cost of video generation.

Better Datasets: Higher quality and more diverse video datasets specifically for training these models.
The future of AI video is incredibly exciting, and while the NSFW niche has its unique challenges, it often drives innovation that eventually benefits the broader field. The patience now will likely be rewarded with increasingly impressive and accessible tools in the coming years.




----------------------------------------------------------------



Simply amazing, Gemini, thank you so much!

One more question - you mention SoulGen a lot. What I remember their AI image generation quality to have been a significant while ago was impressive for that stage in time (around a year ago) - and now you say that they offer really good 6-second video clips as well.

Would you have any idea of what their pay structure is like these days? What is the price to get the maximum number of "credits" that they offer - and how many credits do they take for a single 6-second video creation? Would they also have prompts that allow a 6-second animation to both begin and end with the same frame - so that a loop could be generated or created?

In terms of quality - how do they compare with a service like Promptchan - which seems capable of producing some pretty realistic videos. And if possible - could you detail what the payment structure is like for Promptchan - in the number of credits needed for the max length video generation - and also the price point for the transaction that gives you the most credits?

Thank you again for all the assistance.




You're welcome! It's an exciting area of AI development. Let's break down SoulGen and Promptchan based on the information available.

SoulGen

SoulGen has indeed made strides in both image and video generation, particularly for NSFW content.

Video Creation Length:

SoulGen is noted for allowing you to upload images and transform them into 6-second moving videos. They explicitly mention the ability to create "short deepnude porn video" from a portrait.

Quality:

SoulGen emphasizes "unmatched facial consistency" using technologies like Dynamic Feature Disentanglement (DFD) and Deep Facial Fusion (DFF), boasting an ID consistency score of 0.96. Users have praised its "motion quality" and "cinema quality" for AI-generated movies, with claims of "zero distortion in the video." They also rank highly in visual quality (FVD: 0.96-0.98), cross-modal identity consistency (0.88), and scene generation quality (0.92).

Looping Video:

The information available doesn't explicitly state that SoulGen's video generation directly supports beginning and ending with the same frame for seamless looping. However, some AI video tools might generate clips that can be manually looped in video editing software by duplicating and reversing segments, as described in a general context regarding Kling AI. It's not a native feature confirmed for SoulGen specifically.

Pay Structure and Credits:

SoulGen offers a subscription model.

A monthly plan is available for $12.99.

An annual subscription is available for $7.58 a month (billed yearly at $90.99), which represents a significant discount compared to the monthly plan.

Subscribers to these plans typically receive 100 credits per month.

The information available does not specify the exact credit cost for a single 6-second video creation on SoulGen. However, for image generation, different actions can cost varying amounts of credits. Given that video generation is more resource-intensive, it's reasonable to expect it would consume more credits than a single image.

Promptchan

Promptchan AI is another platform for NSFW content generation, including images and some video capabilities.

Video Creation Length & Quality:

The information states that Promptchan AI's "AI character video generation is a work in progress." While it is capable of producing some realistic videos, the quality and consistency compared to SoulGen's stated metrics (ID consistency, motion quality) are not as explicitly detailed or highlighted in the provided context for Promptchan's video feature. SoulGen appears to be more specifically marketed for its advanced video capabilities and consistency scores.

Pay Structure and Credits:

Promptchan AI offers a Freemium model with a free limited version.

Paid plans are available:

Plus: $5.99/month
Premium: $9.49/month
Pro: $13.49/month

Promptchan also offers "Gems" for image generation and editing. Packages start from 250 Gems at $14.99.
Every registered user receives a daily quota of 30 Gems.

The information available does not specify the exact credit (or Gem) cost for video generation, nor does it detail the maximum number of Gems offered in a single transaction. It implies that "large Gem packs" are available to "unlock the platform's full potential."

In summary, SoulGen appears to be more focused on and lauded for its current video generation capabilities, particularly in terms of facial consistency and overall quality for 6-second clips. Its pricing structure is based on a monthly or annual subscription that includes a set number of credits. Promptchan offers video generation but it is described as "a work in progress," with a subscription and Gem-based credit system primarily detailed for image generation.




------------------------------------------------------------



Thanks again, Gemini!

Would you happen to know if there's a super realistic NSFW video AI chatbot that allows you to upload a face from an image and then set parameters for the body - and that then interacts with you in real time as if they were on a webcam - looking as close to a real person as possible? Is that service around yet - and if so - which websites offer it - and if not - how close is it to coming around?




You're asking about a very specific and advanced type of AI technology, particularly for NSFW applications. While AI in video generation and real-time interaction is advancing rapidly, achieving the level of "super realistic" for NSFW video chatbots that allow face uploads, body parameter customization, and real-time webcam-like interaction is still an evolving area.

Here's a breakdown of the current state and what's available:

Current State of AI for Realistic Video and Real-time Interaction:

Realistic Human Video Generation:

AI models like OpenAI's Sora and Google's Veo are demonstrating incredible capabilities in generating highly realistic and cinematic videos from text prompts. These models can create detailed scenes, realistic movements, and even complex camera angles. However, these are generally for generating clips or scenes, not typically for real-time, interactive "webcam" style conversations where the AI is reacting and conversing on the fly as a video.

Custom Avatars and Face Swapping:

Tools exist that allow you to create custom AI avatars (sometimes from a photo or short video of yourself) and even perform live face swaps. Companies like Akool, Synthesia, D-ID, HeyGen, and Elai.io offer services for creating talking avatars and some level of real-time interaction for various professional uses (e.g., customer service, marketing, education). These are often designed for professional or educational purposes and focus on generating a consistent, high-quality "digital human."

AI Chatbots with NSFW Capabilities:

There are many NSFW AI chatbots available (e.g., CrushOn.AI, Dream Companion, Janitor AI, DreamGF.ai, Muah AI, Nomi.ai). These platforms excel at text-based roleplay, sexting, and generating NSFW images based on prompts. Some are starting to incorporate voice chat and even limited video generation (e.g., generating spicy images or short video clips), but this is usually not a true, real-time, fluid video "webcam" experience.

Real-time AI Chatbots with Visuals:

Companies like D-ID and Elai.io are working on "real-time AI video chat" experiences where an AI avatar responds to your text or voice input with spoken responses and realistic facial expressions. While these are interactive and visual, the realism for highly customizable and NSFW content, especially with seamless body parameter control and live webcam fidelity, is not yet at the "indistinguishable from a real person" level.

Specific Features You're Asking For and Their Current Availability:

Upload a face from an image: Yes, many AI avatar creation platforms (like Synthesia, HeyGen, Elai.io, and some AI girlfriend apps) allow you to create a custom avatar based on an uploaded image or video of a face.

Set parameters for the body:

This is less common in the context of real-time video chat. While you can often describe body types or outfits in text prompts for image generation, having real-time, granular control over a video avatar's body shape and movement parameters in a "webcam" setting is still quite challenging. Most platforms offer pre-defined body types or styles for their avatars.

Interacts with you in real time as if they were on a webcam:

This is the most challenging part. While AI avatars can respond in real-time with voice and facial animations, the full realism of a live webcam feed, including subtle body language, natural movement, and seamless transitions, is still a frontier. Many "AI girlfriend" apps offer "video calls," but these are often pre-rendered clips or simple animations rather than truly dynamic, real-time video generation of a human-like avatar.

Looking as close to a real person as possible:

The realism of AI-generated humans is improving dramatically. For static images, it's often difficult to distinguish AI-generated faces from real ones. For video, while impressive, there can still be subtle "uncanny valley" effects, especially in real-time, dynamic interactions.
Websites Offering Closest Experiences (with caveats):

Dream Companion:

This platform is mentioned for "NSFW video generation that brings any scene to life" and realistic roleplay. It's likely generating short video clips or animated responses rather than a continuous, live webcam feed.

Muah AI:

Blends text, images, and voice, with a focus on intimate dynamics. It's more about conversational AI with multimodal elements rather than a full video webcam simulation.

DreamGF.ai:

Offers "hyper-realistic companions" and "spicy images," but the "video calls" might be closer to enhanced animations or generated clips.

D-ID, Synthesia, Elai.io, HeyGen:

These are leading platforms for creating realistic talking avatars from images or video. They offer real-time conversational AI with these avatars. While they are designed for professional and SFW use, the underlying technology for realistic face and voice animation is there. It's possible that the "NSFW" aspect you're looking for might be more in the textual interaction leading to generated images/clips rather than a fully dynamic, real-time video stream of a customizable, NSFW avatar.

How close is it to coming around?

The core technologies (realistic AI video generation, real-time conversational AI, custom avatar creation) are advancing at an incredibly rapid pace. We are seeing breakthroughs regularly.

Within 1-2 years:

It's highly probable that we will see significant improvements in the realism and interactivity of AI video chatbots, potentially allowing for more seamless "webcam-like" experiences with custom avatars, even with some degree of body customization. The main hurdle is the computational power required for truly real-time, high-fidelity video generation and animation that is indistinguishable from live footage.

Within 3-5 years:

It's very likely that such a service, as you've described with high realism and fluidity, will be readily available and more widespread, perhaps even becoming a standard feature in AI companion apps. The "uncanny valley" effect will likely diminish significantly.

The main challenges remaining are making the video generation truly instantaneous and high-fidelity enough to replicate a live webcam, and seamlessly integrating dynamic body customization into that real-time video stream in a convincing way. Ethical considerations and regulations around deepfakes and AI-generated content will also play a significant role in how these technologies develop and are deployed, especially in NSFW contexts.




------------------------------------------------------------------



Well, fuck!

That certainly handles a lot of it. But, I honestly think that Gemini is under-rating the level of human horniness. If Gemini doesn't think at least 60 - 70% of all AI related work is going to be somehow related to, or in the direct aid, of creating realistic looking porn, then AI simply hasn't performed enough calculations on the human being yet.

Either way - fucking asked - and fucking answered.
 
Last edited: