Baby eaters?

  • Throughout the month of April 2024, participate in the FileJoker Thread Contest OPEN TO EVERYONE!

    From 1st to 30th of April 2024, members can earn cash rewards by posting Filejoker-Exclusive threads in the Direct-Downloads subforums.

    There are $1000 in prizes, and the top prize is $450!

    For the full rules and how to enter, check out the thread
  • Akiba-Online is sponsored by FileJoker.

    FileJoker is a required filehost for all new posts and content replies in the Direct Downloads subforums.

    Failure to include FileJoker links for Direct Download posts will result in deletion of your posts or worse.

    For more information see
    this thread.

buttobi

Member
Mar 29, 2007
769
22
Honestly I don't see the point of having a negative reputation system. Is it useful? No, it isn't. If you check the numbers of post and thanks, you can have a rough idea what kind of person someone is. The green/red indication isn't necessary. Above all it's not enjoyable to see someone in red. We are here for fun. Assess our fellow's value in the real life but not here. If you find an offensive post like flaming you feel unacceptable, report it to the mods and that's enough. Those trolls who repeatedly post offensive and obnoxious crap will only make an ass out of themselves. Assessment isn't necessary. Ignore them or leave them in the hands of the Admin/mods. And when you find someone's opinion too extreme, refute it with reason. Pushing the rep button will not add any honor to you.

my two cents here
 

elgringo14

Survived to Japan
Super Moderator
Apr 28, 2008
9,094
338
I think some guys here take this rep system too seriously.
It's just "for fun", and does not relate to real life statements, right ? :dunno:
It's like the neverending discussion whether loli mangas are pedophilia stuff or not (and don't start discussing this here please!).
I also think "baby eaters" deserve their status if they really mess up with our message board.