Asami Kondou 近藤あさみ

She said several times that she is not the one who defines the content of the movies or the level of exposure.
When she arrives on stage she doesn't even know what outfits she'll be wearing.
On X she wrote once that the agency had someone in charge of checking the level of exposure and it was that person who would stop the photographer.
I also remember her writing on her sub that she did not have any specific NG.

The problem is that she's way too old to stay with this agency.
She's 26, all the others seem to be minor.

Anju, Eyu, Ai, all left the agency. Look at what they started doing after....
Excuse my ignorance, but which Eyu are we talking about? I'm curious to know.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tatoche63
Excuse my ignorance, but which Eyu are we talking about? I'm curious to know.
I was talking about Eyu Hirayama.
Same agency, she did one DVD with FACE (like Anju, Asami, Ai...).
She left the agency but kept doing "cute TikTok videos" while saying she wanted to be an idol.
But it was found out last year that she had started working as a prostitute while doing the "cute TikTok" videos.
 
She is not poor at the level of pre fantia Ai per example, she owns a car too, so her side works is giving her good money (whatever she is doing in her private time) but certainly she can earn a good amount of money switching to creators content like fantia but i prfer myfans or candfans that are not that restricted like fantia.
Asami bought her fourth car earlier this year...
 
Extremely poor taste to publicly post an AI picture of something like that, which she never did and would likely not do going forward. Shame on you.
Used AI image checking websites and they say the cock sucking photo is likely AI edited, but the other photos look real
 
Used AI image checking websites and they say the cock sucking photo is likely AI edited, but the other photos look real
Did that too, had mixed results. Some saying it is, some say it's not, some say there is some probability.
Given the uncertainty about the image itself, I’ll stick with: "We don’t know, but it was probably edited".
 
Last edited: