Why is Ushijima Iiniku in the banned list?
- Thread starter dkjfgfj874
- Start date
-
Throughout the month of April 2024, participate in the FileJoker Thread Contest OPEN TO EVERYONE!
From 1st to 30th of April 2024, members can earn cash rewards by posting Filejoker-Exclusive threads in the Direct-Downloads subforums.
There are $1000 in prizes, and the top prize is $450!
For the full rules and how to enter, check out the thread -
Akiba-Online is sponsored by FileJoker.
FileJoker is a required filehost for all new posts and content replies in the Direct Downloads subforums.
Failure to include FileJoker links for Direct Download posts will result in deletion of your posts or worse.
For more information see this thread.
Technically it's not a banned list but a list of things that can't be uploaded.
She's there because she's sent us a DMCA many years ago. She's very aggressive about protecting her intellectual property.
She's there because she's sent us a DMCA many years ago. She's very aggressive about protecting her intellectual property.
It is nice she finds ways to fill her time.
Seriously though, don't you find the whole concept of "intellectual" property just a little offensive? By purest defintion intellectual property is just an "idea" and one can't really own that. A person can share an idea with others but that is pretty much all an idea is good for. I mean sure, there is something honorable about giving someone credit for an idea but to say one actually "owns" it is really another matter entirely. Now I do understand that the term "intellectual property", as used here and elsewhere, often means something different but I truly think they should at least use a different term. It is just a misuse of the word. An "intellect" can't really own anything anymore than an emotion can but at least "emotional property" does have a certain ring to it, (even if that is not appripo here either).