How do you store your JAV/Porn Collection?

ArtemisINFJ

Member
Nov 5, 2022
23
28
i usually store it in a HDD, I bought two drives which contains 4TB of collection, but the first drive had corrupted. I'm still trying to recover the data but it will take awhile. I also bought dvds but rarely watch it on big screen because I have softcopy of the film somewhere in the drive.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Nasu no shogun

chupachups

Member
May 9, 2010
49
19
I currently have one 4TB HD only for compilations and Best Of videos that's only about half full. I also have an 8TB HD that's completely full, both from Seagate. I just bought a second 8TB to backup the first. I'm wondering if I should buy another 8TB or invest in a server. The server might be the right choice though because no matter how much I try to limit myself only to videos of my favorite actresses and only those videos that really get me off, the collection just keeps growing too fast!

In the past, I lost two computers full of JAV when they failed completely (and before I knew you were supposed to back up your files). I've lost maybe 100 gigs of JAV from the early 2000s (the OIKAWA Nao, MONBU Ran era), most of which I've found again, some of which I cannot find anywhere.

-Nasu
don't bother with seagate externals, they overhead and die when trying to sustain 8TB of copying

you can see this for yourself if you install crystaldiskinfo and keep it running when doing the copy/backup...it gives a verbal warning that the drive is overheating

if you get a NAS or better a server, you can run RAID5 or zfs to give you drive redundancy

I have a NAS with 4 drives each of 4TB running zfs z1, giving 12TB usable...last week one drive failed, but no problem, with z1 redundancy I copied off the 12TB to a 2nd NAS, replaced the drive and rebuild the zfs vdisk...I could have kept the data in-situ and resilvered, but I felt it was safer to backup and rebuild

my server has 8x 4GB drives, giving 28TB usable running RAID5
 
Feb 26, 2021
91
57
don't bother with seagate externals, they overhead and die when trying to sustain 8TB of copying

you can see this for yourself if you install crystaldiskinfo and keep it running when doing the copy/backup...it gives a verbal warning that the drive is overheating

if you get a NAS or better a server, you can run RAID5 or zfs to give you drive redundancy

I have a NAS with 4 drives each of 4TB running zfs z1, giving 12TB usable...last week one drive failed, but no problem, with z1 redundancy I copied off the 12TB to a 2nd NAS, replaced the drive and rebuild the zfs vdisk...I could have kept the data in-situ and resilvered, but I felt it was safer to backup and rebuild

my server has 8x 4GB drives, giving 28TB usable running RAID5
Impressive!
 
  • Like
Reactions: chupachups

chupachups

Member
May 9, 2010
49
19
Impressive!
I'm building a new pair of servers to host my main movie collection (non JAV)

one as the main server, the second as backup/failover

40TB of usable storage on each, 8x6TB drives in RAID5 config


I've seen the servers sell for around $100 second hand, plus extra for the drives...but 8x3TB server for about $300 in total

the benefit of the server over the NAS is that I can run loads of other stuff on the server too...jdownloader, plex server, qbittorrent, nzbget, virtual machines hosting home websites/NGINX, all really easy when you have 48GB and 16 vCPU, all for $300 :D
 
  • Like
Reactions: intrepid8

intrepid8

ぺニバンレズ Enthusiast
Oct 10, 2009
489
297
one as the main server, the second as backup/failover

40TB of usable storage on each, 8x6TB drives in RAID5 config

Just out of curiosity, did you explore RAID50 as an option? Figure that might give you even faster read speeds than two independent RAID5 setups.

the benefit of the server over the NAS is that I can run loads of other stuff on the server too...jdownloader, plex server, qbittorrent, nzbget, virtual machines hosting home websites/NGINX, all really easy when you have 48GB and 16 vCPU, all for $300 :D

I feel like off the shelf NAS offerings from Synology, QNAP etc. can also accomplish most of these tasks now pretty well, either through manufacturer packages or run through a Docker installation.

Nice setup by the way!
 

quxinna

Member
Jun 10, 2022
42
8
Just out of curiosity, did you explore RAID50 as an option? Figure that might give you even faster read speeds than two independent RAID5 setups.



I feel like off the shelf NAS offerings from Synology, QNAP etc. can also accomplish most of these tasks now pretty well, either through manufacturer packages or run through a Docker installation.

Nice setup by the way!
RAID50 is too expensive for personal usage,RAID5 is cheap and fit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: intrepid8

Sad Preference

New Member
Mar 11, 2023
2
2
I try to upload to some cloud platform like google drive. It's not as quickly accessible as storing on a physical disk, but there won't be any disk corruption and data loss.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: granatnik
Feb 26, 2021
91
57
Just out of curiosity, did you explore RAID50 as an option? Figure that might give you even faster read speeds than two independent RAID5 setups.



I feel like off the shelf NAS offerings from Synology, QNAP etc. can also accomplish most of these tasks now pretty well, either through manufacturer packages or run through a Docker installation.

Nice setup by the way!
Just out of curiosity, did you explore RAID50 as an option? Figure that might give you even faster read speeds than two independent RAID5 setups.



I feel like off the shelf NAS offerings from Synology, QNAP etc. can also accomplish most of these tasks now pretty well, either through manufacturer packages or run through a Docker installation.

Nice setup by the way!

I gotta ask: what video is your avatar from?
-Nasu
 

chupachups

Member
May 9, 2010
49
19
RAID50 is too expensive for personal usage,RAID5 is cheap and fit.
the dell T320/T420 servers I get 2nd hand have H310 and H710 HBA in them, and they support RAID50

stand alone cards on ebay are about $30...the servers have been selling for about $300 with drives
 

chupachups

Member
May 9, 2010
49
19
I try to upload to some cloud platform like google drive. It's not as quickly accessible as storing on a physical disk, but there won't be any disk corruption and data loss.
I did this using youtube some years ago...making the videos private...so far youtube hasn't banned me...but its a chore to upload at most 12 videos a day
 

chupachups

Member
May 9, 2010
49
19
I feel like off the shelf NAS offerings from Synology, QNAP etc. can also accomplish most of these tasks now pretty well, either through manufacturer packages or run through a Docker installation.
I have a couple of QNAPs...but being about $300 without drives for a 4 caddy system, I'll stick to the 2nd user servers to give more bang for buck