No more children, please!

Not familiar with that site. Were they a forum or an agency? uzzled: What kind of wreckage are we talking, here? :joker:

In all fairness, I have heard of at least one other site that was taken down unexpectedly. The difference though, is that the site I'm referring to was nailed by a copyright holder and not taken down due to an issue with the content itself.

I still stand by the idea that the JI content on this site really doesn't merit the "ZOMG! Get me outta here!" reaction. I'm guessing if the people who rail against it actually viewed a vid, they'd be more inclined to think the whole thing was stupid rather than offensive (OR they might like it, I DARE you to watch a Yukari Nakai vid and not thinks she's hot! You can't do it, you just can't. If you say you did, you're a liar!).

Nevermind. I was just citing an example for arguments sake. I think it is a relatively unrelated set of circumstances.

Just out of curiosity... Where exactly on the site *is* this "Junior Idol Forum" that keeps being mentioned?

While I agree haveing a kid when your that young is hard. The age of consent has very little if anything to do with kids haveing sex and/or haveing kids. You could raise it to 21 or even 30 and that would NOTHING to stop kids haveing sex and/or becomeing pregnant.

The AOC is just an some number the moral minority have convinced the goverment that is an age they think that people can consent to sex. The higher the better this bunch of prudes seem to think. These are the kind of people who think that fancying someone who is ABOVE the age of consent but more than a couple years younger then you makes you a pedo. :sadomaso:

ircaddicts, I agree with you that no amount of legislation will prevent people fucking or trying to fuck each other at any age; the religious zealots and thought police try to control us by using prohibition as a means of control and we all know what happened with prohibition before.

If you found this forum, it shouldn't be too hard finding the Jr Idol section...besides, your already getting a taste of it 'note my avatar' picture.

I'm surprised people bash the Jr Idol section, Loli Land probably ranks #1 in most questionable material. Altho its not real stuff, your in for a hell of a shock if you go in there.

Personally I'm not into that type of stuff and prefer my Jr Idols.

I better get out the fire extinguishers, Loli land users will probably come and flame me now, better run for cover.

Flame you? I have something better in mind. Let me introduce you to my Little Loli assassin!

That was quite gory. :death:

I am not sure what is more hilarious, the original poster's babbling, or the replies! It made for a very hilarious read for the most part! andalaugh:

I wouldn't know how to find CP now, I think it has become very anonymous and underground, unless it has been wiped out.

Listen. Enough to debate with bigots. Nonnude not prohibited, so talk with them should end just so - go away from this site. This is not the site of Jehovah's Witnesses or Adventists. Most of the bigots and especially those who are "fighting against pedophiles"- a female religious fanatic, sectarians or have a sick mind.

I repeat - don't more to discuss with patients. In Russia we have a man by the name Alexander Nevzorov, who is requires to ban horse riding and the equestrian sport in Europe. When reporters asked him whether he could agree to take part in discussions with officials athletes, he said: "The only thing I can discuss with them - this menu at their memorial service." The same applies to the bigots. Discuss with them only the menu at their memorial service.

Do not make a idiotic debate with them. For example, production of conventional (18+) porn long prohibited in Europe and Russia (Article 242 of the Criminal Code of Russia, the term - up to 2 years old, "manufacturer for distribution or advertising, distribution, advertising pornographic material 18+..."), broadcasting porn long banned on TV, but I have not heard that bigots demanded a complete ban porn and I have not seen that they writing on the web forums: "no more 18+ girls."

Don't feed the trolls.

so self-righteous that made me lol hard

i agree again , no more children!!!!!!

I personally have no interest in the Junior Idol section what-so-ever, which is why I never frequent it - Simple, huh?

I think the real interpretation of "No more children, please!" should be applied to people who obviously operate at a child's level and have an equally limited mindset. If people break the rules, inform a Mod/Admin; if you disagree with a person's preference, then take your gripe somewhere else. :joker:

I'm in the middle. I don't find anything wrong with "older" juniors like Tomoe or Nanako, but if you seriously think that a nine year old in a g string is cognizant of what they are doing you are f-ing retarded. One is a young developed woman the other is still years away from puberty, they don't even belong in the same category. If you think that 9 year old is seriously getting the money when her father is the type that would put his elementary aged child out there you are kidding yourself and you know it.
But whatever floats your boat. I don't like the younger idols it so I avoid it. My worry about it being posted here is that it could eventually lead to the site being shut down in the States at least.

She is cognizant of the fact that she is being paid to show off her beauty in front of the camera. Most young girls enjoy being the center of attention.

I read an article recently that suggested that puberty, that is the chemical changes to the body that will eventually lead to the ability to procreate, actually begins around 5 years of age. We generally only recognize puberty once the signs are visible. And the average age of the onset of puberty (using the generally accepted term) is actually decreasing 3 months every 10 years. But why is puberty so important? If a girl is beautiful, she is beautiful.

I don't think about it. Maybe he is and maybe he isn't. That's an issue for the courts. The girls in question don't look deprived though, thats for sure.

This is pretty much my viewpoint, but whatever as long as the younger ones aren't harmed in any way even if some of it is very dubious. It's probably less damaging than the child beauty pagents that go on in the states (which is totally hypocritical of right wing America in the first place).

Is it thy spirit that thou send'st from thee
So far from home into my deeds to pry,
To find out shames and idle hours in me,
The scope and tenure of thy jealousy?

--From a sonnet by William Shakespeare.

Oh Jeez ... ;p

Art we talking in thee/thy/thou terms now then ?!?

Unfortunately, in the REAL world, any site that posts pics
of KIDS not only attracts the "wrong kind of visitor", but
also the "wrong kind of attention" from the authorities, no ?!?...

... and DON'T think your Proxy makes you anonymous, Mr. P. File

Of course as anyone who posts pics of kids is ALLWAYS a pedo. As is anyone who ever looked at pics of kids too right ? :notagain: :sadomaso: Me thinks you you to vist the REAL world too. Where the vast majorty of people who post and look at pics of kids are NOT pedos at least not what you think of as a pedo. IE a child molster