The G-spot may be a myth

[Blackmarrow]

Apparently based on some researcher done by The Kings College London team, researchers have concluded the g-spot in women may in fact be a myth.
Here's a link to the article on the BBC website

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/8439000.stm

I'm interested to hear what people here think of this, I'm especially interested in any female opinions.

[scarletsnow]

If a mythical spot makes a female feel good, she still feels good. If a mythical spot gives a female an orgasm, she still has an orgasm. So instead of researching it, experience it: stick a finger, penis, vibrator, dildo or the handle of a hairbrush in there and just see what, where and how it feels good.

[Blackmarrow]

Originally Posted by scarletsnow

If a mythical spot makes a female feel good, she still feels good. If a mythical spot gives a female an orgasm, she still has an orgasm. So instead of researching it, experience it: stick a finger, penis, vibrator, dildo or the handle of a hairbrush in there and just see what, where and how it feels good.

I see where your coming from but they where not trying to figure out what felt good for woman. Their aim was to investigate if there was a specific bundle of tissue in all womens vagina that if stimulated, regardless of the women it would give an intense orgasm.

[RickyDicky]

Speaking as someone who has used Beverly Whipple's book to achieve great success and hours and hours of unbelievable fun, I think this just goes to show how unbelievable these studies can be. I'm sure you can find a study that twists data and refutes the effect of mankind on global climate change...just sayin'
I'm not sayin' study author Andrea Burri is frigid and a stuck up prude, I'm sayin' she probably never had a proper schtupping, I'm just sayin,.
http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/tue-august-18-2009/cnn-s-just-sayin- (@ 1:45 min)
The operative word "may" is a lot like "just sayin'"
"I'm not sayin' your Mom's a whore, I'm sayin' she fucks guys for money, I'm just sayin'"

My personal, deeply penetrating research shows that not only does the G-spot exist, but it causes female ejaculation, and may even be the secret to world peace. I'm not sayin' Tim Spector is virgin that never finger-banged a pussy, I'm sayin' he didn't do it right, I'm just sayin'.

For more inflammatory arguments about squirting pussies and not doing it right, see my thread here:
http://www.akiba-online.com/forum/showthread.php?t=15106
Next those blowhards will be doing a study that show that anal isn't fun!

[Sakunyuusha]

Suppose I provide you with eight identical wooden doors. Suppose behind six of them is a glass of water. Suppose behind one of them is a glass full of sawdust. Suppose behind the last of them is a glass full of honeyed milk. Suppose I let you investigate all eight doors, and suppose I refill the contents of any one glass should you empty it. The door which leads to the honeyed milk always leads to the honeyed milk. Likewise for the others.

Suppose 95% of people report that they prefer the door which leads to the honeyed milk and, if permitted to choose freely, they will choose to always open that door once they know what lies behind each of the eight (from previous trials and errors). Suppose for sake of argument that this door is Door #6.

If I asked you, "Is there any difference between the doors that might explain why Door #6 is preferred 19 times out of 20 to every other door?", you would have to answer, "No, there is no difference. The doors all look the same. They are all built the same. You could not tell them apart even if you were to break them down."

Would you then deny the existence of the honeyed milk behind Door #6!?

The problem with much of the G-spot research is that the researchers are convinced there must be a difference between the G-spot tissue and the other vaginal tissue. I am not convinced this is true. I think that perhaps the tissue is all the same but only the stimulation of the G-spot specifically elicits such a strong response. In other words, the vaginal tissue isn't where the difference lies: the cerebral cortex is. It's the end of the sensory nerves' pathway, and not their origin, which accounts for the difference between G-spot stimulation and stimulation elsewhere. Because only the nerves located at the G-spot have a final pathway destination which lies somewhere in the brain strongly linked with pleasure.

So instead of looking for anatomical differences, they should try to figure out a way for people to have their brains imaged while they are in free motion. In other words, to have something akin to a CT or MRI done to them while they are having sexual intercourse. This is incredibly difficult (and previously argued to be outright impossible) because the technologies require the utmost stillness while the imaging is being done -- and you can't really have sex, let alone G-spot stimulation orgasms, if you have a motionless dick inside of a motionless vagina.

[RickyDicky]

Originally Posted by Sakunyuusha

The problem with much of the G-spot research is that the researchers are convinced there must be a difference between the G-spot tissue and the other vaginal tissue. I am not convinced this is true. I think that perhaps the tissue is all the same but only the stimulation of the G-spot specifically elicits such a strong response. In other words, the vaginal tissue isn't where the difference lies: the cerebral cortex is. It's the end of the sensory nerves' pathway, and not their origin, which accounts for the difference between G-spot stimulation and stimulation elsewhere. Because only the nerves located at the G-spot have a final pathway destination which lies somewhere in the brain strongly linked with pleasure.

My experience was that the G-spot did feel different, after arousal, and especially after stimulation. It feels like a raised pad about the size of a dime. (The best way I can describe it is - run your finger across the back of your other hand and feel the last knuckle where a finger joins the hand - it's a little bump) (those of you with fat sausage fingers - sorry, probably won't work.) You can definitely feel the difference from before and after stimulation. With stimulation it becomes engorged with blood. It maybe the same tissue, but that spot reacts differently to stimulation than other areas of the vagina. While I have had my hand in there, I never really felt around for other things: light switches, key holders, latte machines etc.; if you know where what you're looking for is, why would you look elsewhere? It does take some firm pressure to get it going, and that is contrary to what I just read after a quick Google. It may be true that every woman doesn't have one; my most positive experiences were with one woman, but I would be willing to check all the rest of the women in the world! The problem, besides the fact that it doesn't light up with a flashing light, is that it can initially cause the feeling of the need to urinate which can cause a woman to be uncomfortable, not aroused. If this shuts them down before they even get started, then they could easily convince themselves that they don't have one. Personally, I thought the whole idea of studying identical twins was kinda stupid. Just sayin'.

[Aqua2213]

Originally Posted by RickyDicky

It may be true that every woman doesn't have one

Maybe just the women in London don't have one.

I have found the Gee spot and almost drowned by the after affects.

I've heard that the clitoris has 8,000 nerve endings but I betcha it's only 4,000 and the G spot has the other 4 grand.
All those receptors really pack a punch!
Vaginas and penises are awesome! Thank you creator!!

Please don't start a thread about the "Myth of the Wet spot".
It does exist.
It's a bar in a small neighboring town here where I live.

[Gir633]

Whatever the results, I bet the researchers had fun looking for it.



I have to do some "research" for my paper, so why don't you come over to my lab tonight. I'll light some candles, put on some soft music, and open a bottle of wine, and we can get down and make a little science.

[Astb]

Well, since I'm of the female variety, I figure I should step up and say: If a male G-spot can exist, whether there is a physiological difference or not, then a female G-spot can exist.

Personally, I've discovered mine and what biblical floods it can cause. I would say it exists because I feel a difference, and not just in my head. My friends would back me up, some who were ignorant of the 'potential' existence of the G-spot until college. I do agree that not all women have one and/or it doesn't produce the same type of sensation. I do think that regardless of being identical twins, each can be wired differently. Nerve sensitivities and endings aren't identical all the time (from what I've been able to glean).

Another thing is that not all women were taught to find their G-spot in a class, so one twin may have done her independent research or had a talented partner and learned that way, while the other (poor thing) was left out of the club. Who knows?

[scarletsnow]

When females are taught how to masturbate to an orgasm, the percentage of females that masturbate jumps to a similar level as males.

So I feel that for instance half the geography classes in highschool should be replaced by masturbation classes for females.